More nakedly joyous than cautiously optimistic, Nikhil Chopra’s forecast for the upcoming Kochi-Muziris Biennale suggests a fever dream. The Goa-based artist promises a dynamic edition that embraces a state of flux. “Vibrant, shapeshifting, moving, shaking, pulsating, vibrating, breathing and sweating” are some of the adjectives he threw about in the manner of prophecy at a recent talk in London. His teaser, though impromptu, eerily sums up the rapturous tenor of each of his performances across the arc of his artistic career, from Sir Raja II (2003) to Fire X Fire (2024). Perhaps this very alignment between his artistic temperament and curatorial tendencies made him the best choice as artistic director of the Kochi-Muziris Biennale 2025-26.
The upcoming edition, which begins on December 12 and goes on till March 31 next year, follows on the heels of a controversy-ridden fifth instalment (2022-23), whose opening was unceremoniously ‘postponed’ 48 hours before the official inauguration, after most of the art world cognoscenti had already landed in Kochi. Financial mismanagement, post-pandemic shipping delays, and structural oversight were among the reasons for the embarrassing deferral. Incidentally, the only thing to open on time during the fated last edition was the live art programme Where Do We Stand Now? put together by Chopra and HH Arts Spaces, the Goa-based organisation he co-founded in 2014, at Dutch Warehouse. Shubigi Rao, who was then the artistic director, along with participating artists, issued a joint letter to the Biennale appealing for a structural overhaul. Venu Vasudevan, known for using his bureaucratic prowess to rescue state-run institutions from inertia, was subsequently roped in as the chair of the Biennale’s board of trustees, while Thomas Varghese was appointed to oversee the Biennale’s management and administration. Co-founder and trustee Bose Krishnamachari assumed the role of president. He, along with his co-panelists—curator Shanay Jhaveri, photographer Dayanita Singh, collector Rajeeb Samdani, and artist and artistic director of KMB 2014-15, Jitish Kallat—voted in favour of Chopra as the sixth edition’s curator, along with HH Art Spaces.
Chopra is aware of the enormous responsibility he shoulders. “The stakes are really high,” he said over a video call from Kochi. “This one just has to be a success!” But, as his teaser suggests, he is optimistic, perhaps on account of the longevity of his collaborative relationships, particularly with his artist-partner Madhavi Gore and with French artist Romain Lousteau, with whom he conceived HH Arts Spaces. The trio are no strangers to working with frugal budgets and limited resources. Chopra interprets his current role as “a two-year immersive performance in the persona of an art curator”, an exhilarating proposition for those of us who have witnessed his longue-durée performances and are familiar with his aptitude for conjuring narrative suspense primarily through non-verbal bodily cues.

The 51-year-old artist is always actively silent, while his plotlines lie on the spectrum between intuitively choreographed and wholly unscripted. Prior knowledge of his practice or background information pertaining to the performance, though welcome, is rarely a pre-requisite for immersion. Every pregnant second bears an immediacy, whether entangled in rituals of inaction, rest or art making. Chopra’s body is usually the protagonist, fluidly engendering a range of personae as he ‘makes art’ in front of his audience, often through the medium of drawing, using materials whose properties or histories echo the contextual specificities of the site in which his work is unfolding. Each performance feels like a “dynamic process”, embracing a vibrant “state of flux, shapeshifting, moving, shaking, pulsating, vibrating, breathing and sweating”.
Chopra achieves this quasi-mystical effect by surrendering to the durational nature of the process. He uses time the way a watercolourist uses water. And in doing so, he creates a “neutral” emotional site—a judgement-free space. This begins by not judging himself. “I don’t already think that I’m creating a beautiful performance or an ugly performance, or I’m enjoying it or not enjoying it. These feelings that one has are left outside of that realm of thinking about what it is that I’m doing in the moment.” Emotional neutrality doesn’t mean passivity. “It’s important for me to make the audience feel active in their presence, that, if anything, this is a cycle of looking but also of being looked at, which means I am not a passive object placed in a vitrine or on a wall that gets looked at, but an active object that has the ability to return the gaze.”
“The stakes are really high... This one just has to be a success!”
The cycle of sending and receiving and vice versa is an aspect Chopra is also looking to nurture within the Biennale this time, which is titled for the time being. When I ask him if the main exhibition would be eschewing spectacle for the processual, he reminds me that there is spectacle in vulnerability. “The way in which I place the audience allows them to become vulnerable with me, become aware of their presence with me, and, therefore, implicate themselves in making sure that we see ourselves through this experience, as opposed to seeing ‘me’ through this experience,” he explains. “Because in every spectacle, you want to come to the end of that story… We risk together, and we are victorious in this moment together.
Across performances, Chopra actively collapses the boundaries between process and practice by placing the labouring body at the centre of art making, so that the process becomes the artwork. This early-career decision offered him the objectivity he felt was crucial to “divert attention away from the artist as the author of the work”. It runs through the corpus of his artistic output, beginning with Sir Raja II, his first public performance in 2002 at the Department of Art’s graduating exhibition at Ohio State University. Attired like an affluent, Westernised, British Raj-era Indian prince, Chopra was seated beside a lavishly laid table positioned at the end of a 350-feet-long red carpet, bearing the demeanour of a subject sitting for a portrait. The table setting evoked the still-life genre of Western painting. “I sat motionless for three hours, the food was warm and aromatic to start with and then started to smell by the end of the show. I felt like I had arrived home,” he narrated in an Instagram post in June 2021.











